On October 31, CPJ and 27 partners urged Sandvine to strengthen its commitment to human rights following its removal from the U.S. Entity List. They called for robust oversight and transparency of new policies, especially in light of the harm caused to journalists and citizens in oppressive regimes. A prominent journalist criticized Sandvine for not addressing the significant issues faced by affected communities.
On October 31, the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) joined forces with 27 human rights organizations to urge Sandvine to fortify its commitment to uphold human rights standards. They specifically called on Sandvine to align with the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights and ensure greater oversight and transparency regarding its recently initiated human rights policies. The partnership was sparked by Sandvine’s recent removal from the U.S. Department of Commerce’s Entity List, from which it had been added in February 2024 due to its provision of surveillance technology to governments like Egypt and Belarus. This technology was used for invasive web monitoring and the suppression of independent news, prompting serious concerns about human rights abuses. CPJ, along with its partners, insists that Sandvine must address the harms inflicted by its past actions, demanding a comprehensive accountability framework around its announced reforms and human rights due diligence processes. It called for remedies for affected individuals and communities, especially those in oppressive regimes. Nora Younis, editor-in-chief of Cairo’s Al-Manassa, expressed frustration at Sandvine’s lack of clarity regarding its impact on Egyptian citizens. “Where is the apology to the Egyptian people?” she questioned, as independent media in the country continues to face severe restrictions due to Sandvine’s technology, which has led to the blocking of numerous outlets.
In the complex realm of technology and human rights, Sandvine’s controversial history highlights significant ethical dilemmas. Previously linked to oppressive regime practices, the company faced backlash for its deep packet inspection technology, which facilitated censorship and surveillance in countries known for suppressing free speech. With its recent changes in leadership and policies, the push for accountability and reform represents a crucial junction for the company’s future and its social responsibility.
CPJ’s concerted call for action emphasizes the urgent need for Sandvine to bear responsibility for its past complicity in human rights violations. By demanding transparency, accountability, and remedies for the affected, these organizations foster a collective hope for a future where technology serves humanity rather than enabling oppression. Sandvine stands at a pivotal moment, where its choices could redefine its legacy amidst growing scrutiny of tech companies’ roles in democratic societies.
Original Source: cpj.org
