In a wave of controversy, New Zealand’s human rights chief, Stephen Rainbow, recently issued an apology for remarks deemed “Islamophobic”. The backlash came from both Jewish and Muslim communities, emphasising that such sentiments have no place in New Zealand’s diverse society. Rainbow reached out to the Federation of Islamic Associations of New Zealand (FIANZ) to personally express his contrition, recognising the gravity of his statements.
His comments suggested that Muslims represent a greater threat to the Jewish community than white supremacists, sparking fierce criticism from various groups, including Alternative Jewish Voices and Dayenu: Jews Against Occupation. Philippa Yasbek, a representative from these organisations, highlighted that Rainbow’s assertion severely misrepresents the actual risks posed by white supremacists, who form the majority of violent extremists in New Zealand.
Following this meeting, Yasbek voiced her indignation to Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith, questioning how one could lodge complaints against a racist Human Rights Commissioner. In a subsequent email to FIANZ, she echoed her displeasure at the troubling nature of Rainbow’s statements.
FIANZ also expressed disappointment, underscoring that Rainbow’s comments undermine the integrity of his office and pose a significant threat to human rights advocacy in the country. Goldsmith, who appointed Rainbow despite a lack of recommendation from an independent panel, stated that he has no plans to call for Rainbow’s resignation, despite the uproar surrounding the incident.
Stephen Rainbow, New Zealand’s human rights chief, apologised for comments labelled as Islamophobic after backlash from Jewish and Muslim groups. His assertion that Muslims pose a greater threat to Jewish communities than white supremacists has drawn heavy criticism. Rainbow has expressed regret, and FIANZ condemned his remarks as damaging to human rights advocacy. Justice Minister Goldsmith stated he will not ask for Rainbow’s resignation despite the controversy.
The incident involving Stephen Rainbow serves as a stark reminder of the delicate balance required in discussing sensitive topics such as race and religion. His remarks have instigated justified outrage from both Jewish and Muslim communities, marking a troubling chapter in New Zealand’s approach to human rights. Acknowledging the need for improved understanding and dialogue is crucial for moving forward and preserving the integrity of the Human Rights Commission.
Original Source: www.aa.com.tr
