In a troubling twist, human rights groups in Peru are sounding the alarm over a new anti-NGO law that severely restricts civil society organisations from holding the state accountable for human rights violations. This law, deemed a ‘simply brutal’ move by critics, undermines access to justice for the vulnerable. Recently, Congress pushed through amendments with 81 votes in favour, propelling further government oversight while threatening NGO independence.
Supporters of the law argue it enhances transparency regarding foreign funding and curbs foreign interference. Yet, before the vote, lawmaker Alejandro Aguinaga took a shot at NGOs, accusing them of exploiting international aid for personal gain. Aguinaga, tainted by allegations of complicity in forced sterilisation atrocities, ignites further controversy with his remarks.
Carlos Rivera, director of the Legal Defense Institute, painted a grim picture, claiming that the law could critically hinder legal defence for human rights abuse victims—typically represented by NGOs. Under the new law, NGOs face penalties up to $500,000 for litigating against the government, which Rivera laced with deep constitutional concerns. This move echoes the oppressive 1995 amnesty laws that once shielded military abuses.
Julia Urrunaga from the Environmental Investigation Agency refuted claims of NGO unaccountability, asserting their compliance with existing regulations. She posited that the law stifles NGOs’ ability to operate freely and defend citizens’ rights. Similarly, Indigenous rights group Orpio labelled the law a grievous setback for justice access.
Navigating a landscape marred by military rule and persistent corruption, civil society organisations have been vital for Peru’s progress. However, the ultra-conservative faction has latched onto conspiracy theories regarding foreign aid, stirring public sentiments against NGOs. President Boluarte has echoed this opposition, warning that human rights rhetoric could undermine state authority even as she faces scrutiny over recent anti-government protests, rife with violence and allegations of corruption.
Peru has enacted a controversial anti-NGO law that hinders civil society’s ability to hold the state accountable for human rights violations. Critics, including NGOs and human rights activists, argue that it significantly restricts access to justice, imposes heavy fines for legal actions against the government, and threatens NGO independence. Amidst declining approval ratings for President Boluarte, this move is seen as part of a broader governmental agenda to curtail civil rights.
The passing of Peru’s anti-NGO law marks a perilous moment for human rights and civil society in the nation. Critics warn that this legislation restricts vital access to justice for victims of abuse, poses serious financial penalties for NGOs, and threatens their independence. In a broader context of governmental crackdowns on civil liberties, these developments signal a worrying trend that raises questions about the future of democratic governance and human rights in Peru.
Original Source: www.theguardian.com
