At the Harvard Law School’s Human Rights Program, join a hybrid event featuring Kieran McEvoy as he navigates the complex landscape where law, politics, and the agency of armed groups converge. Drawing on nearly thirty years of experience in Northern Ireland and extensive research in multiple conflict zones, he will delve into encouraging armed groups to acknowledge their past human rights violations through transitional justice mechanisms. McEvoy’s discussion will highlight the challenges of purely legal approaches and explore the contentious nature of amnesties or limited immunities that might prompt these groups to participate in reconciliation processes. He will also present a framework to evaluate the legitimacy of reparative actions, such as truth recovery and public apologies, from armed groups.
The panel is moderated by Anna Crowe, a Senior Clinical Instructor and Associate Director at Harvard Law School’s International Human Rights Clinic. Crowe supervises law students on issues relating to gender in armed conflict and international trade policies that aim to curb human rights abuses. Her extensive experience includes collaborations with organisations like Amnesty International and the Norwegian Refugee Council. Previously, she served as a constitutional lawyer for New Zealand and was a clerk to the Chief Justice at the New Zealand Supreme Court.
Kieran McEvoy’s hybrid presentation at Harvard Law School explores the intersection of law, politics, and the responsibility of armed groups for past human rights abuses. Drawing from his extensive experience in conflict zones, he discusses the effectiveness of transitional justice processes and the challenges of legal engagement. Anna Crowe moderates the panel, bringing her expertise in gender and armed conflict, highlighting significant issues pertinent to human rights accountability and reconciliation efforts.
Kieran McEvoy’s presentation at Harvard Law School encapsulates the intricate relationship between armed groups and the legal framework surrounding human rights accountability. By examining the balance of law, politics, and responsibility, he proposes innovative methods to incorporate these groups into transitional justice processes. The insights shared by both McEvoy and Crowe pave the way for thoughtful discourse on achieving accountability and reconciliation in post-conflict societies.
Original Source: hrp.law.harvard.edu
