The concept of human rights, which is often touted as universal, appears to be selectively applied, especially when concerning Jews or Israelis. This stark reality was laid bare recently when major international human rights organizations remained mute as the bodies of Israeli hostages, including two infants, were displayed in a grotesque Hamas propaganda ceremony. Despite the horrendous events surrounding their capture on October 7, these NGOs chose complicity over action, revealing a hidden agenda behind their silence.
For over 15 months, Amnesty International issued numerous reports accusing Israel of various crimes while ignoring the plight of the Bibas family, who were held captive. When their remains were paraded in front of an audience of jeering civilians, Amnesty had nothing to say. This omission was mirrored by Human Rights Watch, which chose silence rather than condemning the use of hostages in such a cruel context.
Save the Children International, an organisation supposedly dedicated to protecting children, has been equally silent on the Bibas children. Despite its mission, it has failed to denounce the horrific precedent set by using children as hostages. Meanwhile, UNICEF briefly acknowledged the Bibas children in a September briefing but offered nothing substantial in response to their suffering.
The United Nations Human Rights Office has similarly been quiet about the Bibas family. While they have condemned Hamas’s exploitation of captives, they have shamefully equated the dignity of hostages to that of terrorists. Prominent figures like Francesca Albanese, known for commenting on alleged abuses by Israeli forces, remained silent while hostages were displayed like trophies by Hamas.
The International Committee of the Red Cross, after 500 days without visiting the captives, found itself witnessing the deplorable spectacle of their treatment. While they protested in a muted manner, they still participated in the disheartening display, showing a glaring double standard in their approach to human rights.
The reluctance of these NGOs to respond robustly to the inhumane treatment of hostages highlights a disconcerting double standard. Their persistent focus on alleged Israeli abuses, while ignoring human rights violations against Jews, demonstrates that these principles are weaponised for political agendas. This betrayal undermines the credibility of human rights advocacy in conflict zones.
Even amidst ongoing attacks against Israel, human rights organisations frequently pressured for ceasefires, which inadvertently empowered terror groups. Such misguided interventions allowed armed factions to regroup, leading to more violence. The lack of a firm stance against the abhorrent treatment of Israeli hostages showcases how these groups have facilitated a cycle of terror, putting human rights in jeopardy.
Major human rights organisations have remained silent regarding the treatment of Israeli hostages, including infants, displayed in a Hamas propaganda event. This silence showcases a double standard in applying human rights ideals. The consistent failure to condemn violence against Jews, while actively pursuing allegations against Israel, reveals how these principles are exploited for political gain, undermining their universal relevance.
In summary, major human rights NGOs have displayed a shocking silence regarding the treatment of Israeli hostages, notably the Bibas children. Their actions—or lack thereof—reflect a broader double standard that marginalises Jewish suffering. By failing to condemn Hamas’s propaganda, these organisations compromise the principles they claim to uphold, effectively undermining the very essence of human rights advocacy. Ultimately, their complicity with the Hamas agenda highlights the perilous state of human rights principles, as they become tools for political manipulation rather than universal safeguards against inhumanity.
Original Source: www.jpost.com
