In a decisive move, President Trump signed an executive order in the Oval Office to withdraw the United States from the U.N. Human Rights Council. This action coincided with his meeting with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who faced criticism for his military campaign in Gaza, marked by significant civilian casualties, including over 47,300 deaths, primarily among women and children. The recent ceasefire showed the inability of the Israeli regime to fulfill its wartime aims against groups like Hamas, leading to the return of displaced Palestinians to the northern Gaza Strip.
The announcement came through Trump’s aide, who stated that the U.S. participation in various U.N. bodies has demonstrated a pronounced anti-American bias. The executive order not only calls for the U.S. exit from the Human Rights Council but also advocates withdrawing from the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA), which addresses Palestinian refugees, and reviews America’s financial involvement in UNESCO. These steps were presented as a response to perceived inequities in funding allocation within the U.N.
After signing, Trump expressed a belief in the U.N.’s potential, lamenting its failure to address global conflicts effectively. He criticized its management and suggested that many ongoing disputes should have been resolved long ago with proper international support. In a controversial statement, he suggested that Palestinians would be eager to leave Gaza if given the chance, stating, “They would ‘love to leave Gaza.'”
President Trump has announced the U.S. withdrawal from the U.N. Human Rights Council during a meeting with Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu, amidst ongoing tensions in Gaza resulting in extensive civilian casualties. His aide cited anti-American bias as the rationale behind the exit, which extends to reviewing U.S. participation in UNRWA and UNESCO. Trump emphasized the U.N.’s potential but criticized its management, suggesting Palestinians would prefer to leave Gaza if possible.
President Trump’s withdrawal from the U.N. Human Rights Council underscores a significant shift in U.S. foreign policy, influenced by a perceived bias against America. With allegations of high civilian casualties in Gaza and the complexities of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict at the forefront, this executive order raises questions about America’s role in international human rights discussions and the broader implications for peace efforts in the region.
Original Source: en.mehrnews.com
