In a transparent attempt to gloss over its atrocities, the Iranian regime has submitted a lengthy report to the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights in an effort to justify the death sentences of political prisoners Mehdi Hassani and Behrouz Ehsani. However, this document, laden with legal terminology, serves merely as a desperate bid to endorse state-sponsored murder while quelling dissenting voices.
Hassani and Ehsani, both committed political activists, have faced charges for their dedication to freedom and justice. Allegations detailing their supposed crimes—ranging from affiliations with the People’s Mojahedin Organization of Iran to supposedly shouting anti-government slogans—appear more like a paranoid regime’s tactic to stifle opposition than legitimate legal claims.
The judiciary’s High Council for Human Rights makes the absurd assertion that recent protests, allegedly tied to the PMOI, instigated terrorist actions against security forces. It paints Hassani and Ehsani as the orchestrators of these alleged crimes, listing exaggerated claims such as vandalism and armed uprising. Yet, these accusations reek of forced confessions and fabricated evidence, notorious methods the regime employs to suppress dissent.
The regime’s irony-filled portrayal of its judicial process paints a facade of fairness, claiming adherence to international law. While it insists both accused had legal representation, it discreetly fails to mention the stipulation that defendants can only choose from a government-sanctioned roster of lawyers—hinting at the regime’s oppressive grip on the judiciary.
Despite citing constitutional provisions against torture, evidence of inhuman treatment in prisons is rampant, alongside forced confessions publicised as warnings. Furthermore, the regime paradoxically insists internationally that the PMOI lacks presence in Iran while simultaneously branding its members a significant security threat, revealing the reality of a growing and powerful opposition.
This conflicting narrative unveils the regime’s profound fears. The executions are not indicative of strength; rather, they stem from a panic in the face of a robust resistance. With 71 condemnations from international bodies over systemic human rights abuses, this latest justification for executions is less a legal argument and more a political propaganda effort.
The entanglement of death sentences for Hassani and Ehsani marks just one facet of an expansive record of the regime’s violence. Such acts of brutality cannot extinguish the enduring spirit of the Iranian populace yearning for freedom, but instead further isolate the regime. Each oppressive act ignites the fervour of unyielding resistance that refuses to be silenced.
The international community must not be misled; these executions masquerade as justice but are, in truth, heinous crimes deserving unequivocal condemnation and immediate action.
The Iranian regime has released a 12-page report to justify the executions of political prisoners Mehdi Hassani and Behrouz Ehsani. This document, filled with legal jargon, attempts to legitimise state-sanctioned murder amidst accusations of dissent. Both activists face exaggerated charges, and the regime’s narrative reveals deeper fears of a growing opposition. The world must recognise these executions as crimes warranting international condemnation and action.
Overall, the Iranian regime’s frantic justifications for the executions of Mehdi Hassani and Behrouz Ehsani highlight their desperate attempt to suppress dissent while projecting an illusion of legality. This narrative illustrates the regime’s profound fear of an empowered resistance movement and reinforces the urgent need for the international community to take a firm stance against such brutal acts.
Original Source: irannewsupdate.com
