Keith Kellogg, the US envoy for Ukraine, recently found himself at the centre of controversy following a misrepresentation of his comments regarding potential peace arrangements for Ukraine. After a report suggested he compared the situation in Ukraine to post-war Berlin’s partition, Kellogg took to social media to clarify his remarks. He expressed that he was discussing the idea of zones of control for allied forces, specifically excluding US troops, rather than advocating for the division of Ukraine itself.
In further details, Kellogg explained that an Anglo-French-led force could operate in the western parts of Ukraine alongside a Ukrainian military presence and a demilitarised zone, suggesting that such a setup would not provoke Russia. His mention of a 18-mile demilitarised area along existing control lines indicated a structured approach to peacekeeping, aimed at ensuring Ukraine’s sovereignty.
While his comments hinted at a possible framework for peace, they also reflected President Trump’s vision amidst ongoing tensions. However, Kellogg was adamant that the US would not deploy any ground forces, and he acknowledged Russia’s existing control in parts of Eastern Ukraine. This situation remains delicate, especially after Russia previously warned against NATO involvement, stating they would reject any peacekeeping troops from these countries.
The discourse around a ceasefire continues, with US officials, including Trump, expressing their frustration with the lack of progress in negotiations. Despite urging both Moscow and Kyiv to come to the table, major breakthroughs remain elusive, emphasising the challenges that lie ahead in resolving this enduring conflict.
US envoy Keith Kellogg clarified his comments on Ukraine’s peace deal after being misquoted by The Times. He discussed potential zones of control for allied forces, specifically excluding US troops, and refuted any notion of partitioning Ukraine. The complexity of the negotiations remains as both the US and Russia engage in tense discussions regarding the conflict’s future.
In summary, Keith Kellogg’s remarks on Ukraine’s potential peace arrangements were misinterpreted, leading to concerns over the division of the country. He clarified his position as advocating for zones of responsibility for allied forces, while ensuring that no US troops would be part of a peacekeeping effort. The ongoing clash continues to evoke strong reactions, as US officials grapple with the complexities of securing a lasting ceasefire in Ukraine.
Original Source: www.wionews.com
