In a striking suggestion reminiscent of the post-World War Two era, Gen. Keith Kellogg, former special envoy to Ukraine, posits that Ukraine might be partitioned into zones of control for a potential peace agreement. This division could echo the Berlin model, with British and French forces overseeing western regions while Russian troops remain in the eastern territories, separated by a demilitarized zone controlled by Ukraine.
Kellogg envisions an Anglo-French reassurance force located west of the Dnipro River, asserting that Ukraine’s vast geography could accommodate multiple armies without provoking Moscow. He stated, “You could almost make it look like what happened with Berlin after World War Two.” However, he clarified that the U.S. would refrain from deploying ground forces in this scenario.
The proposed demilitarized zone would extend approximately 18 kilometres, aligning with current control lines in the eastern Donbas area. By suggesting this partition, Kellogg seems to hint at U.S. acceptance of Russia’s entrenched control over its occupied regions.
Adding to the complexity, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov reaffirmed Moscow’s stance against NATO military presence in Ukraine during peace negotiations. Kellogg’s remarks followed a lengthy meeting between another U.S. envoy and President Vladimir Putin, which was deemed productive by Russian media.
In conjunction with these diplomatic efforts, Donald Trump issued a stark message on social media, urging Russia to take action to end the ongoing conflict, highlighting the dire humanitarian toll.
U.S. envoy Gen. Keith Kellogg suggests that Ukraine might be divided into zones for peace settlement, similar to post-World War Two Berlin. He outlines a plan involving British and French troops in the west and Russian forces in the east, with a demilitarized zone in between. However, the U.S. won’t send ground forces. This proposal comes amidst heightened tensions with Russia, as NATO military presence remains a stumbling block.
The proposal for partitioning Ukraine into zones of control raises significant questions regarding sovereignty and international norms. Gen. Kellogg’s suggestions showcase a potential path towards peace, albeit one that involves complex negotiations and acceptance of current territorial realities. The U.S. stance appears to support this division, while Russia remains firm against NATO’s involvement, indicating a precarious balance in the pursuit of resolution in this enduring conflict.
Original Source: tvpworld.com
