Kellogg’s Proposal for Ukraine: Zones of Responsibility Echoing Berlin

In a thought-provoking interview with The Times, Keith Kellogg, former Special Envoy for Ukraine and Russia under President Trump, proposed a controversial approach to resolving the ongoing conflict in Ukraine. He suggested that the nation could be organised into distinct zones of responsibility, reminiscent of the divisions in postwar Berlin, with various allied forces overseeing different areas. He envisioned British and French troops managing the western zones while the Russian army would maintain presence in the eastern regions. This arrangement could potentially create assurance for a demilitarised space between Ukrainian and Russian forces, where trust can gradually build.

Kellogg’s concept highlighted the strategic positioning of Anglo-French forces west of the Dnipro River, asserting that their presence would not provoke Russia. He underscored Ukraine’s capacity to host international peacekeeping troops while clarifying that the US would refrain from deploying its own forces. Kellogg proposed an 18-mile demilitarised zone along the control lines to mitigate risks of conflict. However, he expressed doubt over whether Putin would agree to this plan, illustrating the complexities involved.

Following the publication, Kellogg raised concerns about how his comments were interpreted, asserting that the article misrepresented his views on possible partitioning. He emphasised that his remarks pertained to a post-ceasefire support force rather than a formal division of Ukraine’s territory. The political landscape surrounding this issue remains charged, as President Trump continues to voice irritation with Russian conduct, exacerbating an already tense diplomatic climate.

Keith Kellogg proposed that Ukraine could potentially be divided into allied responsibility zones, similar to postwar Berlin, with British and French troops in the west and Russian forces in the east. He discussed the establishment of a demilitarised zone and raised concerns over misrepresentation of his views post-interview, emphasising support without partitioning Ukraine. President Trump’s frustration with Russia complicates the ongoing peace negotiations.

Kellogg’s proposal for a partition-like structure in Ukraine serves as a stepping stone for potential peace discussions, albeit mired in complications and misinterpretations. His emphasis on allied responsibility and the establishment of a demilitarised zone suggest a scenario where peace could be cautiously pursued amidst geopolitical tensions. The clarity of his intentions comes into question, reflecting the broader challenges as international collaborators strive for a resolution.

Original Source: www.pravda.com.ua

About Sofia Martinez

Sofia Martinez has made a name for herself in journalism over the last 9 years, focusing on environmental and social justice reporting. Educated at the University of Los Angeles, she combines her passion for the planet with her commitment to accurate reporting. Sofia has traveled extensively to cover major environmental stories and has worked for various prestigious publications, where she has become known for her thorough research and captivating storytelling. Her work emphasizes the importance of community action and policy change in addressing pressing global issues.

View all posts by Sofia Martinez →

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *