General Keith Kellogg, a prominent US envoy, has proposed dividing Ukraine into zones akin to the post-World War II partition of Berlin. He suggested that British, French, and Russian forces could establish control over different sections, with Ukraine’s military positioned between them in a demilitarised area. Kellogg indicated this division could mimic the historical zones established in Germany, describing the Dnipro River as a natural boundary.
His proposal, however, demands that Ukraine relinquish its eastern territories currently occupied by Russian forces. Kellogg noted that the plan might not gain traction, as President Putin’s administration has already dismissed any peacekeeping presence from NATO as unacceptable.
Despite the allegory to Berlin, stark contrasts exist in Kellogg’s suggestion: unlike Germany, which was compelled to cede land post-war, Ukraine would voluntarily invite troops into western zones. Kellogg’s comments emerged shortly after Steven Witkoff’s meeting with Putin, suggesting a complex diplomatic landscape.
US envoy General Keith Kellogg suggested partitioning Ukraine into zones controlled by British, French, and Russian troops, likening it to post-WWII Berlin. This would require Ukraine to cede eastern territories while incorporating its military in the arrangement. The proposal faces significant opposition from Russia and highlights tensions in international relations concerning Ukraine’s sovereignty.
Kellogg’s proposal for a partition of Ukraine echoes post-war Europe but diverges significantly in terms of consent and military presence. Emphasising Ukraine’s need to concede certain territories, it raises questions about international involvement and the acceptance of such divisions, especially amidst resistance from Russia. In essence, the landscape of diplomacy and military strategy continues to evolve in this fraught geopolitical theatre.
Original Source: www.express.co.uk
