Annelle Sheline, a former US State Department analyst, resigned in protest over America’s role in Gaza and claims that the US government selectively targets adversaries using human rights as a tool, while ignoring violations by allies. In her article for the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft, she illustrates how both political parties exploit human rights discourse to serve military and foreign policy goals rather than uphold legal commitments.
Despite US laws, such as Section 502B of the Foreign Assistance Act, prohibiting aid to nations committing gross human rights violations, these laws remain largely unenforced. Sheline asserts that the US prioritises military primacy over ethical standards, evidenced in its unwavering support of Israel during the Gaza conflict.
Sheline urges that American leaders, regardless of party, fail to uphold human rights consistently, with the rhetoric often differing but not the policies. She notes that Trump’s approach mirrors earlier administrations, as he also prioritises US self-interest.
Additionally, Sheline highlights that while the US uses human rights abuses to justify sanctions against perceived enemies, it gives Israel a pass regarding its actions in Gaza. This double standard suggests that human rights are employed not as guiding principles but as convenient justifications for existing political aims.
Former US State Department analyst Annelle Sheline claims that the US selectively uses human rights to target adversaries while overlooking violations by allies. In her article, Sheline notes that laws prohibiting aid to violators are ignored, with US foreign policy prioritising military interests, particularly in its support of Israel during the Gaza crisis. She argues that both political parties exploit human rights rhetoric without genuine adherence to legal commitments.
In conclusion, Annelle Sheline’s insights expose a troubling pattern in American foreign policy concerning human rights. She advocates for a reevaluation of how the US prioritises alliances and military interests over ethical obligations towards human rights, signalling a pervasive hypocrisy in its dealings with allies compared to adversaries. This unequal treatment not only undermines America’s credibility but also raises questions about its commitment to universal human rights.
Original Source: www.presstv.ir
