The United States has officially challenged Francesca Albanese’s continuation as UN Special Rapporteur, citing “virulent antisemitism” as the reason. A letter from the U.S. Mission to the UN addressed to Secretary-General Antonio Guterres laid bare their stance that Albanese demonises Israel and appears to support Hamas. They argue her reappointment would signal the UN’s tolerance of antisemitism and terrorism.
On Tuesday, Rep. Brian Mast, chair of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, also expressed disapproval of Albanese’s expected renewal for another three-year term. He highlighted that UN Special Rapporteurs are required to maintain independence and impartiality as outlined in Council Resolution 5/2, arguing that Albanese has not upheld these principles.
Mast detailed how Albanese has consistently showcased her alignment with Hamas, accused Israel of genocide, and drawn disturbing parallels between the Israeli government and the regime of Nazi Germany. He condemned her for using her UN position to propagate antisemitic narratives while appearing sympathetic to Hamas.
Following the tragic events of October 7, Albanese remarked on the violence, suggesting it was a consequence of Israeli actions. This casting of blame has drawn scrutiny, prompting organisations like the Simon Wiesenthal Center to commend Mast’s stance and call for Guterres to reject her reappointment due to her controversial remarks and actions.
The U.S. has expressed strong opposition to Francesca Albanese’s role as UN Special Rapporteur, citing her alleged antisemitism and support for Hamas. Rep. Brian Mast joined the call against her reappointment, highlighting violations of the UN’s code of conduct. Both officials stress the importance of maintaining impartiality within UN roles, raising serious concerns about Albanese’s behaviour and comments.
The United States’ opposition to Albanese’s renewal as UN Special Rapporteur stems from serious accusations of antisemitism and support for terrorism. Concurrently, Rep. Brian Mast has voiced concerns over her conduct, claiming it undermines the UN’s principles. With such significant opposition, the fate of her position remains uncertain as calls for accountability echo across organisations dedicated to human rights.
Original Source: www.jpost.com
