A new thought-provoking article has been unveiled in the Griffith Law Review, co-written by Sanzhuan (Sandra) Guo, a Visiting Fellow at Harvard Law School’s Human Rights Program. Titled “Automated Decision Making and Deportation: Legal Concerns and Regulation,” this comprehensive piece delves into the intricate legal and technological obstacles that immigration departments face with Automated Decision-Making (ADM) systems, specifically in deportation cases. It highlights the pressing need for responsible use and regulation of such systems.
The article stands as a vital resource for understanding the intersection of technology and legal frameworks in immigration processes. By shedding light on the potential implications of ADM, it encourages critical discourse on ethical practices and accountability in decision-making processes.
For those interested in exploring the implications of automation in law further, the article is readily accessible online. It serves both as an informative piece for scholars and a call to action for policymakers in the realm of human rights and immigration regulation.
Sandra Guo’s recent article in the Griffith Law Review discusses the use of Automated Decision-Making systems in immigration, focusing on legal and technological challenges surrounding deportations. It advocates for responsible regulation of ADM to enhance accountability and protect human rights. The article is open-access and available online for public engagement.
In conclusion, Sandra Guo’s article addresses the challenges posed by Automated Decision-Making systems in immigration, especially regarding deportation. It calls for responsible regulation and ethical considerations in the implementation of technology in legal processes. With its open-access format, it invites broader engagement and discussion on these urgent issues.
Original Source: hrp.law.harvard.edu
