Tory MPs are expressing sharp concerns regarding the potential for Russian President Vladimir Putin to exploit human rights laws against British peacekeepers in Ukraine. They have urged Defence Secretary to secure an exemption from the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) for troops deployed in the impending peacekeeping mission. Former cabinet minister David Davis emphasised the government’s responsibility to protect servicemen who might become embroiled in legal battles after their deployment.
Shadow Defence Secretary James Cartlidge echoed these sentiments, advocating for measures that would furnish our armed forces with the utmost legal protections. There is particular anxiety over the experiences of British troops and veterans from conflicts in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Northern Ireland who have faced legal challenges in recent years.
In 2021, the Overseas Operation Bill, which aimed to shield military personnel from unwarranted claims, was passed by Boris Johnson; however, a pivotal clause for ECHR derogation was removed during its passage through the House of Lords. Defence Secretary John Healey reassured that the government remains staunchly devoted to its duty of care for troops, referencing this legislation during parliamentary inquiries.
Keir Starmer is striving to establish an international coalition for peacekeeping efforts in Ukraine, contingent upon a ceasefire with Russian forces. While Starmer has acknowledged the necessity of US support for his strategy, early indications suggest he has not secured backing from the White House. Additionally, Donald Trump’s envoy has publicly critiqued the peace proposal as merely performative, indicating a disconnect with US perspectives on the situation.
In a striking interview, Steve Witkoff, engaged in US-Russia ceasefire discussions, openly admired Putin, suggesting he is intelligent and capable, further complicating the geopolitical narrative.
Concerns arise over British peacekeepers in Ukraine facing legal challenges from Putin. Tory MPs call for ECHR exemption for troops to safeguard them from human rights claims. The Overseas Operation Bill was intended to protect personnel but crucial clauses were removed. Keir Starmer is navigating international support for peacekeeping, yet faces criticism regarding feasibility. Meanwhile, Trump’s envoy’s remarks on Putin add complexity to the situation.
The discussions surrounding the potential deployment of British peacekeepers to Ukraine highlight significant concerns regarding human rights laws and the protection of military personnel. Tory MPs are advocating for exemptions from the ECHR to prevent legal repercussions in the event of conflict. With the future of peacekeeping reliant on international support, particularly from the US, the plans reveal both political ambition and challenges ahead.
Original Source: www.independent.co.uk
