In 2018, the US, under the Trump administration, withdrew from the United Nations Human Rights Council, with Ambassador Nikki R. Haley citing the council’s perceived bias, particularly against Israel. Citing the need for credible humanitarian advocacy, she argued that the US would not support a body that disparaged nations upholding human rights while shielding violators. This move raised eyebrows among humanitarian groups, with critics like John Sifton of Human Rights Watch claiming the administration’s focus was myopically Israel-centric, paradoxically affirming the bias it denounced.
Fast forward to 2021, the Biden administration restored US participation in the UN Human Rights Council, reflecting Biden’s promises for renewed diplomatic engagement. Secretary of State Antony J. Blinken articulated concerns regarding the council’s approach to Israel and the involvement of states with poor human rights records. Despite reservations, Blinken optimistically conveyed a vision of international collaboration to uplift global human rights advocacy.
However, in a turn of events, Trump re-entered the picture and reinstated his administration’s strained rapport with the UN. In a February 2025 executive order, he pulled the US out of the council once more, lamenting its missed potential. This time the US also ceased funding for the United Nations Relief and Works Agency, a move seen as pivotal in the US’s Middle Eastern strategy and viewed critically by many.
This withdrawal has drawn fierce reactions from global entities. Advocates like Amnesty International Australia expressed grave concerns, contending that such departures only weaken international human rights mechanisms and embolden violators. They cautioned that the US decision undermines global accountability, potentially encouraging further humanitarian violations.
At an EU conference, criticism intensified. Belgian MEP Marc Botenga articulated his unease regarding the US’s retreat, suggesting it exacerbates global dangers. He remarked on the irony of a nation with a troubled human rights record itself opting out of critical international norms, questioning Europe’s muted response to these developments. This ongoing cycle of uncertainty surrounding US engagement poses risks to its international diplomacy and its sustenance of democratic values.
The article outlines the US’s turbulent relationship with the UN Human Rights Council, beginning with its withdrawal in 2018 under Trump due to perceived bias, particularly against Israel. While Biden restored US membership in 2021, Trump’s return to power in 2025 led to another withdrawal and ceased funding for a key humanitarian agency. Critics argue this retreat undermines global human rights efforts and prompts backlash from allies, reflecting instability in US diplomacy and commitment to human rights.
The tumultuous journey of the US’s involvement with the UN Human Rights Council reveals a damaging cycle of disengagement that undermines both international credibility and humanitarian advocacy. The contrasting stances taken by different administrations highlight the complexities of international relations and the potential risks that arise from perceived inconsistencies. Ultimately, continuous withdrawal threats not only disrupt partnerships but also diminish the US’s role in the global fight for human rights, posing challenges for allies and undermining democratic ideals.
Original Source: www.irinsider.org
