The ongoing debate surrounding the revision of Law No. 34/2004 concerning the Indonesian Military (TNI) raises concerns about civilian supremacy and human rights. Critics argue that amendments may revert to a dual-function military rather than enhancing professionalism amidst increasing global pressures. Transparency issues were in the spotlight after lawmakers discussed the draft at a luxury hotel near the parliamentary building, undermining public trust.
The necessity for revising the TNI Law lies not just with military interests but also with the broader welfare of society. This long-standing legislation requires updates reflective of contemporary challenges. However, the proposed changes predominantly affect organisational matters rather than core military functions like interactions with the Defence Ministry and roles available to TNI officers.
Notably, the revision increases the civilian roles available to TNI officers from ten to fifteen, with the recent change excluding their potential involvement in the Maritime Affairs and Fisheries Ministry. The civil institutions available for TNI officers include various government agencies ranging from the State Secretariat to the Supreme Court. Meanwhile, adjustments to retirement age stipulate that non-commissioned officers may now serve until age 58, and higher-ranking officers until age 60.
The revision of Indonesia’s TNI Law is controversial, feared to revert military powers rather than enhance professionalism. Transparency issues arose when discussions occurred at a luxury hotel, prompting public disapproval. Updates seek to reflect modern needs, with changes predominantly affecting the military’s organisation, allowing TNI officers to occupy more civilian roles and adjusting retirement ages.
In summary, the revision of the TNI Law is a crucial step necessitating careful navigation to uphold civilian supremacy and human rights. While it aims to adapt the military framework to current demands, the transparency of the process and the implications of allowing military involvement in civilian roles remain central concerns for society. Stakeholders are urged to engage transparently to ensure that the military evolves without compromising democratic values.
Original Source: www.thejakartapost.com
