In a controversial move, Peru’s Congress has passed a law amending the international cooperation regulations, imposing substantial restrictions on non-governmental organisations (NGOs). Critics argue that this legislative change endangers the ability of these organisations to protect human rights and advocate for vulnerable groups amid growing corruption. The amendments expand the authority of the Peruvian Agency for International Cooperation (APCI), raising concerns about the independence of non-profit entities.
Supporters of the reform argue it aims to enhance transparency. However, activists like Carlos Rivera, director of the Legal Defense Institute, assert that this is merely a façade for suppressing dissent. He highlighted a troubling stipulation deeming it an offence for NGOs to offer legal assistance against government actions, potentially crippling Indigenous communities who largely depend on these organisations for legal representation.
Rivera expressed alarm over the implications for justice access, particularly for Indigenous groups, stating that, “From one day to the next, they won’t be able to manage their defenses… nearly 100% of cases are handled by non-governmental organizations”. The government has yet to respond to inquiries regarding the legislation.
Ahead of the vote, right-wing Congressman Alejandro Munante lambasted NGOs for lacking accountability, a claim rebutted by Julia Urrunaga, who underscored that NGOs have diligently reported to the APCI for over two decades. Urrunaga warned that the new legislation would threaten the autonomy of NGOs, stating that government pre-approval of activities could lead to censorship.
Tom Younger from the Forest Peoples Programme expressed that the law poses serious threats to those defending human rights and environmental causes in Peru, pointing to a broader trend of rising authoritarianism globally. The implications of this law send ripples beyond Peru, affecting international human rights advocacy.
Peru’s Congress has passed a law altering international cooperation regulations, imposing severe restrictions on NGOs, which critics claim will hinder human rights advocacy and support for vulnerable communities. Advocates like Carlos Rivera and Julia Urrunaga warn about governmental censorship and reduced access to legal support for Indigenous peoples. The law is seen as an extension of authoritarianism beyond Peru’s borders, jeopardising the independence and work of non-profit organisations.
In summary, Peru’s recent legal amendment has sparked significant controversy, with many fearing it will hinder NGOs’ ability to defend human rights and provide support to vulnerable communities. Critics highlight the potential for governmental censorship and restriction of legal assistance, particularly for Indigenous peoples. The broader concerns reflect a growing pattern of authoritarianism, which may resonate beyond Peru’s borders. The struggle between perceived transparency and the suppression of civil society reflects an ongoing tension in the region, raising alarms among human rights defenders and advocates of justice.
Original Source: www.wral.com
