India has sharply rebuked the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, Volker Turk, for his comments regarding Kashmir and Manipur. The Indian government accused Turk of employing “loose terminology” and selectively presenting issues, labelling his remarks as “baseless and unfounded.” Arindam Bagchi, India’s Permanent Representative to the UN, asserted that such claims starkly contradict the vibrant, pluralistic nature of Indian society.
At the 58th Human Rights Council session, Bagchi highlighted India’s status as the world’s largest democracy and the resilience of its diverse civic space. He urged for a comprehensive understanding of India’s civilizational ethos of diversity and openness, which are integral to its national identity. Responding specifically to remarks about Jammu and Kashmir, he criticized the mischaracterisation of the region and its recent positive developments.
In his address, Turk pointed to Kashmir’s long-standing issues, including the Pakistani-backed insurgency, as well as the burgeoning inter-ethnic conflicts in Manipur this year. He called for increased efforts to address violence and displacement, emphasising dialogue and peacebuilding. Turk also raised concerns about restrictive laws impacting human rights defenders and journalists in Kashmir, warning of arbitrary detentions and a contraction of civic freedoms.
India has condemned UN Human Rights chief Volker Turk’s comments on Kashmir and Manipur as unfounded. Arindam Bagchi, at the 58th Human Rights Council session, defended India’s democratic and diverse society, challenging Turk’s portrayals. While Turk highlighted ethnic violence in Manipur and restrictive laws in Kashmir, India insists these descriptions misrepresent the realities on the ground, particularly regarding Jammu and Kashmir’s recent peaceful developments.
In conclusion, India strongly refuted the allegations made by the UN Human Rights chief regarding conditions in Kashmir and Manipur. The government presents a contrasting narrative, highlighting the country’s democratic vitality and recent advancements in Jammu and Kashmir. Both regions face unique challenges, yet India’s officials advocate for a more accurate portrayal of the evolving situation, stressing the necessity for a deeper understanding of its complex sociopolitical landscape.
Original Source: www.tribuneindia.com
