Economists Warn Trump’s Tariffs Could Harm U.S. Economy

As President Trump threatens to impose heavy tariffs on numerous countries, he claims these measures will benefit the U.S. economy. However, most economists assert that the tariffs will lead to inflation, hinder economic growth, and ultimately burden American consumers. Joseph Stiglitz, a Nobel laureate in economics, stated, “Virtually all economists think that the impact of the tariffs will be very bad for America and for the world.”

Trump’s aggressive trade stance was exemplified on Inauguration Day, where he proposed a 25% tariff on imports from Canada and Mexico due to concerns around immigration and drug trafficking. He also threatened a 10% tariff on China unless it halted fentanyl shipments. Stiglitz noted, “It’s inconceivable that other countries won’t retaliate,” highlighting the political pressures that nations will feel to respond to U.S. actions.

The potential for a trade war raises concerns that businesses will cut back on investments, negatively affecting economies globally. Marcus Noland from the Peterson Institute stated that these tariffs would dampen U.S. economic growth and increase inflation, especially if retaliation ensues.

Trump maintains his tariffs will revitalize American industry, yet economists warn they will harm U.S. manufacturers and farmers instead. Jim Stanford, a Canadian economist, warned about the intertwining of the U.S. and Canadian auto industries: “The tariffs would apply each time parts cross the border. That 25 percent would be compounded on each step.” This cascading effect increases production costs potentially leading to higher prices for Americans.

Economists agree that tariffs typically pass costs to consumers, resulting in decreased spending power which further harms retailers and manufacturers. Noland emphasizes that tariffs do not help industrial recovery but degrade the efficiency of production, particularly when comparing with competitors abroad.

In Trump’s first term, tariffs on China significantly impacted agricultural exports, hitting American farmers hard. Noland cautioned that renewed tariffs on China would likely lead to similar retaliation, further complicating the trade landscape. Eswar Prasad from Cornell highlights the negative impact on U.S. exporters facing rising tariff barriers in foreign markets, stressing that uncertainty breeds instability in business investment and job creation.

Additionally, Stiglitz warns that increasing inflation from tariffs could prompt central banks to raise interest rates, risking a scenario of stagflation where rising costs occur amidst economic weakness. This contradicts Trump’s intention to bolster his tax cuts, as diminished growth leads to reduced tax revenues.

Nomura’s chief economist, David Seif, suggests that while Trump’s other economic policies might soften the blow of tariffs, inflation remains a significant concern. He speculates on two waves of tariffs aimed at controlling immigration and generating revenue, noting the challenge of expanding manufacturing when unemployment is at a low 4.1 percent.

Lindsay Owens from the Groundwork Collaborative underscores the internal conflict within the Republican Party regarding tariffs, questioning how they reconcile increased consumer costs with promises of lowered prices. Tariffs disproportionately affect low-income families, who spend more of their income on goods, including imports.

Paul Krugman criticized Trump’s tariffs as a potential violation of the NAFTA agreement, raising questions about international trust in trade negotiations. Noland added that Trump’s tariff strategy could sour relations with other countries, creating lasting resentment.

According to multiple economists, Trump’s tariffs may result in inflation and slow U.S. economic growth. They predict increased costs passed to American consumers, countering his claims of benefits. Retaliation from other countries is likely, further complicating trade. The tariffs could harm vital industries like auto manufacturing and agriculture, impacting American families disproportionately.

Economists overwhelmingly warn that Trump’s proposed tariffs will negatively impact the U.S. economy, leading to inflation, reduced growth, and financial burdens on American consumers. The looming threat of retaliation from trade partners exacerbates potential damage, particularly to the agricultural and manufacturing sectors. Ultimately, the ambition of revitalizing American industries may backfire, undermining relationships and crippling domestic economic progress.

Original Source: tcf.org

About Lila Chaudhury

Lila Chaudhury is a seasoned journalist with over a decade of experience in international reporting. Born and raised in Mumbai, she obtained her degree in Journalism from the University of Delhi. Her career began at a local newspaper where she quickly developed a reputation for her incisive analysis and compelling storytelling. Lila has worked with various global news organizations and has reported from conflict zones and emerging democracies, earning accolades for her brave coverage and dedication to truth.

View all posts by Lila Chaudhury →

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *