The transitional justice process in Nepal is shrouded in controversy, as rights activists express grave concerns over potential political interference in the selection of candidates for key commissions. With the shadows of partisanship looming large, the integrity and credibility of the process hang in a precarious balance. The ongoing delays, particularly regarding Sudip Pathak’s nomination, underscore the need for genuine independence and transparency if justice for victims is to be realized. Only by adhering strictly to fair practices can Nepal hope to navigate these turbulent waters and fulfill its national goals.
Rights Activists Raise Alarm Over Partisan Interests in Transitional Justice Selections
