The article discusses the need for genuine agrarian reform to resolve conflicts and critiques former President Jokowi’s stagnation on human rights issues. It raises concerns about President Prabowo’s commitment to improving human rights and emphasizes the urgent need for justice concerning unresolved violations. Lack of progress due to nonjudicial methods under Jokowi has diminished hope for victims.
Agrarian conflicts, the predominant source of social discord, require a sincere agrarian reform strategy to address the roots of unrest, often exacerbated by national projects. During Joko Jokowi Widodo’s presidency, progress in human rights was hampered, leading to skepticism about Prabowo Subianto’s intentions, despite his promises of continuity. Under Jokowi, attempts to rectify 12 significant human rights abuses stagnated, highlighting the urgent need for immediate and decisive state action as dilatory justice equates to denied justice. Among the noted violations, only the 2014 Paniai incidents were addressed, while cases like East Timor (1999) and Tanjung Priok (1984) remained unresolved, lingering in the shadows of history. Court proceedings against these trespasses against humanity did not satisfy the victims’ quest for justice, underscoring the necessity of confronting gross human rights violations to ensure legal assurance. Jokowi’s initial populist appeal held the hopes of victims and advocates alike, who expected him to tackle the shadows of past atrocities head-on. However, Jokowi’s strategy relied more on nonjudicial methods, forming oversight and resolution teams rather than pursuing traditional judicial pathways for these heinous events. His acknowledgment of the 12 gross violations marked a step forward; nevertheless, the efficacy and transparency of the implementing teams, comprising various ministries, must be under ongoing scrutiny for genuine progress.
The article delves into the urgent need for comprehensive agrarian reform to address conflicts stemming from land ownership and usage. It examines the ineffective handling of gross human rights violations during former President Jokowi’s administration, raising questions about the commitment of President Prabowo’s administration to resolve these issues. This reflects a historical pattern of justice being neglected, with a call for a more effective and transparent approach in dealing with past abuses.
In summary, agrarian tensions invoke a cry for reform, demanding attention to the root causes of conflict. Prabowo’s commitment to human rights during his tenure remains questionable in light of Jokowi’s stagnation. The necessity for decisive actions to address unresolved human rights abuses is critical for restoring justice, ensuring that victims are not left in the cold shadows of unaddressed offenses.
Original Source: www.thejakartapost.com
